Curaeon Help Centre / KB-014
Open in the Help Centre →  ·  All topics
KB-014AI scribeHow-to
Draft. This article is awaiting technical review and may change — if anything here conflicts with advice from our team, follow the team.

AI scribe — getting the best transcription quality

The scribe is very good and not magic. These habits are what separate practices that love it from practices that fight it.

The audio is everything

The model can only be as good as what the microphone hears:

The AI Clinical Note pane in a consult: consent first, then the sections the scribe drafts — and Assessment, which it never touches.
The AI Clinical Note pane in a consult: consent first, then the sections the scribe drafts — and Assessment, which it never touches.

Dictating vs conversing

You don't need to speak differently for the scribe — it's built for natural consultation. But two habits pay off:

The habit that matters more than all others

The draft is a draft. Review it before it enters the record — every time, no exceptions, however good it's been for the last hundred consults. That's not a disclaimer; it's how the product is designed to be used: the scribe does the typing, the clinician does the deciding. Practices that treat review as optional are using a different product from the one we built.

When quality drops suddenly

A scribe that was fine last week and rough today is a symptom, not a mood: check the microphone hasn't been moved or muted, nothing new is making noise, and the appliance is healthy (KB-010 — Appliance status lights and what they mean). Still off? Report it — quality reports are genuinely wanted: KB-016 — Reporting an AI scribe quality concern.