Curaeon Help Centre / KB-056
Open in the Help Centre →  ·  All topics
KB-056AI scribeFAQ
Draft. This article is awaiting technical review and may change — if anything here conflicts with advice from our team, follow the team.

Why the scribe never writes the Assessment or suggests item numbers

Two things the scribe will never do, by design — so that nobody raises a ticket for behaviour that is working exactly as built.

The short version

A consult note has four sections: History, Examination, Assessment and Plan. With the patient's recorded consent, the scribe drafts three of them — History, Examination and Plan. It does not draft the Assessment, and nothing anywhere in Curaeon suggests an MBS item number or an attendance level. These are the first two of the manual's "three things to know" about the scribe; the third is that nothing leaves the practice.

Three sections drafted, the Assessment left to the clinician — and the same rule on the billing screen, where the practitioner picks the item.
Three sections drafted, the Assessment left to the clinician — and the same rule on the billing screen, where the practitioner picks the item.

"The Assessment is blank — is the scribe broken?"

No. The scribe does not diagnose. It never writes an Assessment, and that boundary is enforced by the software, not by convention. It is not a setting and not a model limitation. The clinician's assessment is the clinician's — the scribe drafts what was said and found, and the judgement about what it means stays with the person who examined the patient.

So a draft that arrives with History, Examination and Plan filled and Assessment empty is complete. Type the Assessment as you would in any other system.

"Why doesn't it suggest an item number?"

Because a Medicare claim is a legal assertion by the billing practitioner, and the software does not put words in their mouth. The scribe does not choose billing items, and neither does the billing screen: Record searches the MBS schedule the practice has loaded and the practitioner picks. Whether an item's requirements were met is the practitioner's judgement, made from what they did — not something to infer from a transcript.

What Curaeon does do on the billing side is catch unambiguous errors. The consult-time and consult-issue checks flag unbilled visits, items not priced, and a visit billed against the wrong patient or provider (KB-052 — Raise, correct and claim an invoice, including when "Send to Medicare…" is blocked). They never judge whether an item suits the appointment.

"Can this be switched on for our practice?"

No, and there is no request to make. Both behaviours are the product working as designed, for every practice, on every build.

What the scribe does instead

The habit that matters is the same as always: the draft is a draft, reviewed before it enters the record (KB-014 — AI scribe — getting the best transcription quality).